Monday, February 27, 2006

Everybody Has AIDS!

I recently watched the hit musical Rent with some friends. I was unsure of how I would like this movie but I was anctious to see it anyway due to all the hype that proceeded it. I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed it. I read some reviews by some secular critics that sang its praises and I also read some Christian reviews which pretty much tore it apart. I can certainly see good points on both sides. It's true, there was a great deal of sexual content including quite a bit of gay action. However, the story was amazing and I was blown away by the unconditional love and loyalty displayed among this group of friends. They were there for one another and accepting no matter what happened or how bad they screwed things up. Although, they displayed a common human characteristic by embracing what I thought to be extremes that were merely a reaction to those who were oppressing them. Now, I'm not going to lie and say that I was completely able to overlook the homosexual elements (there's just something about two grown men cuddling that makes me cringe a little), but they didn't overrun the main point of the movie for me. Overall, I felt like there was a lot to be learned from the film. I wish that I could be as loving and unconditionally accepting as some of the characters.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

More Questions...

A typical question posed by an unbeliever when faced with the idea that the rejection of Jesus Christ ultimately results in an eternity in Hell goes something like this: "Well, what about all those people in Africa or the jungles of South America who never hear about Jesus? Are they going to Hell?" A typical answer that I have heard for this question is that God makes himself known to everyone at at least one point in their lives whether it be through dreams, revelation through creation, that little tugging at your "heart strings"/"God shaped hole", or any of a number of possible scenarios. For a long time this answer satisfied my concerns. However, with age, my mind has this tendency to go and screw everything up. There I was perfectly satisfied with my answer to the question of the so-called "unreached" and their eternal fate.

Now, today, our main source of knowledge throughout most of the modern world about the nature of God and our guide on how to live this life is the Bible (in Christianity). Now, of course this has not always been the case. In fact, in the grand scheme of things the Bible is a relatively recent development. What did people do before we had this book? Now, I still subscribe to the belief that God does place a burden on man's heart to know Him. I believe that we inherently know that there is a god. Almost every notable psychologist in history has dealt with man's search for meaning and why he feels he must search for meaning. Without going too much deeper into this topic it all seems to point to an inexplicable, innate knowledge of the existence of God. With that said, I'm going to set up a hypothetical situation.

Five thousand years ago on the continent we now call North America there lived a man who was the leader of his tribe. We will call him Doug. Doug finds himself searching for meaning in life. He wants to know how he got here. He wants to know where this land he is standing on came from. He wants to know what makes rain fall from the sky, the sun rise in the morning and set at night, where the wind comes from and why he can feel it but not see it. He believes that there must be some greater being, a god, and he has an inexplicable desire to know this god. Doug has no Bible, obviously. Even if he did he can't read and no missionary ever comes to explain God to him. Doug develops his own idea of god and he worships this god. As leader of his tribe he explains his god to all the members of the tribe who, because Doug is the leader and therefore obviously the most intelligent, believe him. This tribe goes on to develop a systematic way of worshiping this god. Rituals evolve and a religion is born based on this man's understanding of this god that he experiences.

At the same time, on the continent we now call Asia, thousands of miles away from Doug, lives another man who is the leader of his tribe. We will call him Bob. Bob too experiences the same search for meaning and feels that there is some greater being whom he desires to know and experience. In much the same way as Doug, Bob develops a religion based on what he experiences and who he thinks that god must be. However, Bob's version of god is much different that Doug's. Neither Doug nor Bob are ever told by anyone who knows the truth about God. They're just doing the best they know how.

This throws a kink in the whole idea that God reveals himself to everyone at some point in their lives and it is up to each man to acknowledge Him and come to a correct understanding from this encounter. What about a person who acknowledges this revelation from God but misinterprets it? Yes, God is capable of making sure that He is properly understood, but if this were the case, everyone would know Him without flaw and the truth is that we don't. We mess things up and give Him a bad wrap all the time.

Now from a universalist point of view, Doug and Bob are both right and will both go to heaven regardless of the fact that they call upon two entirely different gods. If all religions are right and everyone is going to heaven, then there is no reason to even attempt to live for anyone but yourself because everyone is going to heaven. You might as well just enjoy life however you want to now because your eternal fate is already decided. I'm not really sure where I'm going with this right now. I think I'm just running in circles creating more questions that lead to even more questions. I personally believe that Jesus Christ is the only way, but I cannot account for what happens to those who never hear about him nor can I account for the cultural influences on religion and it troubles me greatly. I think that I should just stop writing now.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Sui Generis (it means unique)

Well, it seems that all my friends have been posting their top movies lately. So, in the spirit of conformity I'm going to hop on the proverbial band wagon and give my two cents worth on what I think that everyone should see.

Let's start with the top 5 movies I have seen this year (this doesn't mean that it came out this year...just that I saw it this past year):

5) The Fisher King is one of the best movies that I have ever seen. Now, this movie came out in 1991 but most people that I ask have not even heard of it. It stars Jeff Bridges who is an ex-shock jock in New York who lost everything when a comment he made over the radio spurs a man into a killing spree in a restaurant and then turns the gun on himself. Robin Williams plays an insane homeless man on a quest for the Holy grail who sees and talks to floating little fat people. The story follows both men on their journey together to recovery. It gives some great insights into human nature and is overall an inspiring film. It actually received quite a few awards in its debut. However, I was 8 years old when it came out and therefore oblivious.

4) History of Violence with Vigo Mortenson is an excellent film. It tells the story of a man without a past whose past comes back to haunt him. It's difficult to describe this movie without giving too much away. There are quite a few shock elements in this one with some pretty gruesome imagery. However, I felt it was necessary to the story. The ending is my favorite part of the whole movie.

3) Grizzly Man is by far one of the strangest films that I have ever seen. I have to put it on here, however, because it is the true story of an absolutely crazy man. When you see this movie you will not believe that it is real. It's too absurd. I assure you however that it is authentic. It is a documentary of a failed actor who takes it upon himself to become the "protector of the bears". He travels to Alaska each summer and lives with the grizzly bears claiming to be "studying" and "protecting" them. To make a long story short the guy gets eaten by the bears along with his girlfriend. I know what you are thinking..."That's not funny! That's terrible!" Just watch the movie and then tell me if you still feel sorry for the guy.

2) I was going to put Garden State as my number 2 but everyone else listed it so I'm going to go with Saved with Jena Malone, Mandy Moore, and Macaulay Culkin. I think everyone has seen this but it is a hilarious and painfully true portrayal of the Christian subculture.

1) I'm putting Munich as number one and it was indeed an incredible film. However I numbered this more for organizational purposes and not so much as a ranking system. It is the story of what happened after the murder of some athletes by terrorists at the 1972 Olympics. Speilberg does an excellent job of getting the audience attatched to the five assassins given the task of hunting down those responsible as they attempt to carry out their mission with less than full support of their country.

Monday, February 13, 2006

Bad Joo Joo?

I would like to expound a bit on my previous post concerning the inerrancy of the Bible. However, before I do so I would like to make it clear that I do not in any way, shape or form consider myself to be a Biblical scholar. These are simply a layman's thoughts on an issue that is much bigger and far deeper than he could possibly imagine. With that said....

I stated earlier that it is my belief that it is foolish to assume the complete inerrancy of the Bible. For me, this is not a question of whether or not God is capable of seeing to it that He is represented 100% accurately because there is no doubt in my mind that He is capable. I simply do not think that He chose to do so. Why? I have no idea. But it seems to me that if He chose to make sure that He was not misrepresented in the Bible He would also choose not to be misrepresented in any other book written about Him or by any of the other morons out there on the streets telling gay people that God hates them and that they're the ones responsible for the downfall of our nation. After all, He would indeed be capable preventing such. For some reason He chooses not to. Although I can respect the opinion that Almighty God chose to protect the accuracy of everything in the Bible, it seems to be an avoidance of the question; a sort of easy way out if you will that explains everything that we do not understand without even breaking a sweat. Upon careful reading and study of scripture I find it impossible to overlook certain contradictions. Yes, there are contradictions and to claim otherwise is irrational in my opinion. To claim that the Bible is not a perfect document is not the tantamount of claiming that God is an imperfect God. The Bible is not God! It is an attempt by men to explain a being much greater and unfathomably complex. It can only be expected that we would be unable to represent Him fully. Certainly He is capable of allowing such to happen. There simply are too many things within the word that point in different directions. I think that He chose to tell us exactly what we needed to know. I think He gave us the essentials in that book. The rest must be sorted out in our own hearts and minds as He chooses to reveal things to us which is what I think Paul meant in Philippians 2:12-13 when he said "Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed-not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence-continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and to act according to his good purpose."

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Some People....

Ok...so I know I have already written at least one post on "romantic" issues or dating etc. but I believe I shall present a few more of my own thoughts. I promise that I don't sit around brooding over sexual frustration issues. I'm not quite there yet.

A friend of mine claims she's given up on the notion of some romantic guy sweeping her off her feet along with movies and/or books supporting this mythological creature, the perfect man. She definitely has a point. Now, I'm sure she is not completely serious. Still, this frustration is experienced on both sides of the sex boundary. I too have almost, not quite completely yet, given up on the hopes of some "perfect" woman actually existing. Now, when I say perfect I am not implying that she is without flaw of any kind because that is preposterous. Obviously I mean perfect as in everything that I would want in a woman. Anyway, that is beside the point that I think I'm going to attempt to make.

Believe it or not ladies, truly romantic guys do exist. Unfortunately, the male race has gone and shot himself in the proverbial foot. There are a large number of guys( no, I won't call them men) whom I affectionately like to refer to as bastards, who make the existence of romance difficult for those who believe in it. These individuals have discovered that the way into a woman's( or at least some women's) pants through feigned romance. Now, a lot of times this feigned romance can be difficult to spot at the time. However, its true nature is revealed in time by any number of events that I will not go into here. Also, sexual exploitation is not the only way that guys prove themselves to be jerks.

Not only does this create a problem for women as they inevitably have their hearts broken, but it also creates problems for all those non-asshole guys out there. If a person has been jaded, it almost certainly puts a blemish on any future interest's slate. If a girl is dating a guy and he attempts to do something "romantic" for her, she is certainly going to wonder if this is simply another attempt at getting into her pants. This fear may be diguised as ridicule claiming that the guy is being sappy or cheezy. However, he may be. It just depends on the guy. Only with time can he prove himself not an asshole to her. That is not necessarily wrong. It just seems a shame to me that it is "safer" to be presumed guilty until proven innocent rather than the other way around. Despite the fact that it is a shame, it would be unwise to not be suspect at all.

On a slightly lesser note, all of these romance novels and "chick flicks" make it increasingly difficult, although certainly not impossible, to come up with a truly original idea.

Anyway, that's at least some of what I have to say about that. I could go on but I'm not trying to write a book here.

you don't have to feel excluded

Well...it was recently brought to my attention that I had only granted permission to comment on my site to registered bloggers. I apologize for this. The error has been corrected so that now all of you out there who are just dying to write something on here will be able to.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

From Yesterday Comes Tomorrow

Have you ever noticed how one day it seems as though the world will come crashing down around you throwing you into what seems like utter dispare, and not two days later you can feel almost carefree? Some days it feels as though God has either deserted you or never existed in the first place and others you see Him all around you. Maybe this is simply a product of my tendency to be a bit melodramatic at times. Still, this phenomenon baffles me. In truth, even in the worst of bad days, chances are your circumstances are not that different than they are on any give good day. It seems as though you should be able to remind yourself of this truth anytime you have a bad day and immediately find peace. Why is this not the case? Why are we rational when things are good and more irrational when things seem bad? I know this is a more prevalent condition in some than others. I suppose it is all part of being human. The good would never seem great if there were no bad to compare it to. Maybe this is why people who have the world handed to them on a silver platter seem so unhappy sometimes. In a world without adversity there is no triumph.

Monday, February 06, 2006

The Almighty Pen

It is amazing to me how people who read the Bible and read...I don't know...say..the writings of Paul who is admittedly not perfect, a human man who made mistakes in his life, a man who said and did things that were wrong, and yet for some reason when he puts pen to paper, no matter what he said with that pen and paper, we are to assume that it is completely without flaw. I am not in any way trying to negate the power of the Bible nor am I saying that it is not at all God's word. All I am saying is that it seems foolish, to me, to assume that it is without error. I know this is a broad topic which has been the subject of great contraversy for ages. I just felt like saying it myself for some reason...whatever.

Saturday, February 04, 2006

More Thoughts on Humans

I had a comment on one of my previous posts that somewhat indirectly got me to thinking about humans again. Now, this is going to be my thoughts partially on intimate relationships with people of the opposite sex and partially on strictly plutonic relationships so please bear with me.
I remember when I was a little kid seeing my father as a man larger than life. He was a big man, at least to me at the time, whose physical strength astounded me. I remember he would flex his muscles and I would be amazed at the size of his biceps that were roughly the size of my head. He could snatch me up with one arm and hang me upside down by my ankles while tickling me with the other until I couldn't breath. I asked him how tall he was and he said he was 6' tall. Being myself not much longer than a yard stick and not much thicker, 6' tall to me was something to dream about. I remember watching Batman with him and after the movie was over he would always tell me in a secretive voice, "You know...that movie is about my life. I'm Batman." As a child, part of me believed him even though I knew Batman wasn't real. Yet still, if there was a Batman, he was probably my dad. He was also the wisest man I knew. No one knew more about the Bible or life in general than my father and anybody who disagreed with him had to be wrong. His anger was something to be feared as well, not in the sense that I was afraid that he would seriously hurt me or anything like that. My father had, actually still has, this look that he would get on his face when he was angry with you that just made you feel about 2" tall. It is strange. The look was basically an expressionless stare. Something about his eyes drenched you in shame or fear or whatever it is he is trying to get across. I hated "the look". "The look" was often accompanied by a scolding in a low voice followed by a dreaded spanking. And I don't mean one of those one hit slaps on the butt with a hand. These were real spankings with a belt or some other unpleasant object and you were going to cry whether you wanted to or not.

Now, when I was little, I don't remember ever being angry with my father, or my mother for that matter, for punishing me. I almost always knew that I deserved it. As I got older, however, I began to question whether or not I deserved the punishment I received for misbehaving. I still admit that 7 times out of 10 I probably deserved what I got. But it was those 3 that I felt that I had been unjustly accused and punished that had a part in shattering my perfect image of my father. Also, on a less important note I grew up to be half a foot taller than my father. He was no longer larger than life to me. He was a man. Still, he was and is a great man whom I admire greatly and aspire in many aspects to be like. Yet, he became just a man.

On another note, as a child growing up I would see my favorite athletes and they too seemed larger than life. Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player in the world and I dreamed of replacing Scottie Pippen as Jordan's right hand man. Jordan would never be beaten by anyone. He was perfect. Inevitably my image of him would be shattered by knowledge of his personal life that was less than perfect. My image of what greatness was slowly began to crumble with each insight into the imperfections of humans.

As I grew older still and became interested in girls, I developed an image of the perfect woman from what I knew of my mother, who was perfect by the way, and from women in movies and books that I read. I also developed an image of what it would be to be "in love" from watching my parents, movies, books, and also the Bible. Ever the imaginative kid I would conjure up fantasies in my mind of rescuing this dazzling beauty from impending danger killing the bad guy and sweeping her off of her feet only to live happily ever after in perfect bliss and harmony. The perfect woman was a tall blonde haired, blue eyed, soft spokenly wise beauty with an even temperament to whom I would write beautiful poetry and spoil with flowers constantly. We would stare longingly into one another's eyes for hours on end whispering sweet nothings into each other's ears. We would never fight because we would love one another so much that any disagreement would be easily resolved with compromise. Traveling the world we would have adventure after adventure until we decided to have two children at which point we would live in a nice house in a good neighborhood and raise them to be professional basketball players. That's the condensed version of what it was going to be like to be in love.

Needless to say, this idea of the perfect woman and a life therewith is dead to me. What I am attracted to these days is much different than it was then. However, I did have a relationship in which the girl was most of the things I listed above, although certainly not soft spoken. At least I thought she was at the time. For a while it was bliss and disgustingly romantic and I did attempt to spoil her with poetry and flowers and all the things that I thought would make her be desperately in love with me and I with her. She was larger than life to me. She was the perfect woman. I had her on a pedestal as my queen. However, the inevitable did happen and despite my greatest attempts to ignore the signs, I realized that she too was indeed imperfect. I thought our love was eternal and we would be together for all time. The idea of life without her was inconceivable; that is, until the walls of my fantasy came crashing down. My perfect woman was imperfect. We were imperfect.

It was all more than I could bear at the time. The time since then has been spent in reflection and confusion about what is, what is not, and what can be reality. Are those words in Shakespeare's Sonnet 106 based on anything real? Is it possible to feel that way about a person? If you felt that way about a person would it be anything real or would it be a denial or distortion of truth? Is it right, wrong, or neither to have heroes that are mortal men? Do our naive notions of those who we see as great healthy or inevitably destructive to us? I have no real answer to any of these questions. My only thoughts are that everything that we experience in this life whether it be triumph, failure, love, loss, loyalty or betrayal molds us into who we are and what we become. Why did God create man in such a way that we became imperfect? I suppose that it is important to have exaggerated and idealistic views of some things in order for us to have something to strive toward. Without these we would be doomed to always settle for things that we do not want and become people who are less than great. I believe that fantasy is a beautiful thing as long as we realize that it is just that. Without a healthy understanding of the difference between fantasy and reality, the effects of failure, loss, and betrayal will have a much greater impact on us than is necessary.

Anyway, I was thinking about all these things and decided to write my thoughts down. I hope you will give me yours. Am I full of crap? Am I right? Is it even worth thinking about?

Thursday, February 02, 2006

in the blazon of sweet beauty's rest

When in the chronicle of wasted time,
I see descriptions of the fairest wights,
And beauty making beautiful old rhyme,
In praise of ladies dead and lovely knights,
Then in the blazon of sweet beauty's best,
Of hand, of foot, of lip, of eye, of brow,
I see their antique pen would have express'd
Even such a beauty as you master now
So all their praises are but prophecies
Of this our time, all you prefiguring:
And, for they look'd but with divining eyes,
They had not still enough your worth to sing,
For we which now behold these present days,
Have eyes to wonder but lack tongues to praise.

--Sonnet 106, William Shakespear

I want to meet a woman who can inspire a man to write something like this.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

i am pretense

In their time of peace and plenty, never does Your name escape their lips
In propitious circumstance when wine flows as free as the cash passing hands their tongues sing praises unto I
The created stands in wonder and awe of himself
They are wise, they are powerful, they are man
They are above such puerile thoughts that they were created
Indeed, You must be of their own cognition
At once a great beast arises
A thing of such great evil wreaking havoc, invoking fear, pain, loss
Oh Great Creator where have You gone they cry
Deliver us from this fiend for You are our savior
They know you not my Lord I say, not as I do
See how I am Your servant
See how I acknowlege the works of Your hand
See how I praise you with arms lifted high
See how wise You have made me
Watch as I go forth and use this wisdom
Days pass as I live this life that I know is so pleasing to You
Weeks go by and I do not call upon your name for I know that You are pleased with me
I become so impatient with those that You must be ashamed of
For they do not know of You as I do
At once a great beast arises
A thing of such great evil wreaking havoc, invoking fear, pain, loss
Oh Great Creator where have You gone I cry
Deliver me from this fiend for You are my savior